ABHISHEK KUMAR vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 76/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.
Bail Petition - Regular Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO010007802026
e-Filing Number
20-01-2026
Filing Number
697/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
76/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
209
Police Station
TILAUTHU
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ABHISHEK KUMAR
Adv. Ramesh Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
allowedView PDF
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge Rohtas granted regular bail to 23-year-old Abhishek Kumar in an Arms Act case, finding that he was arbitrarily named in the FIR despite being merely a pillion rider with no possession of arms and having been in custody for over eight months. The court allowed bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, as a warning chance under section 480(3) of B.N.S.S., 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
18-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
10-Feb-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
21-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 76/2026
Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge Rohtas granted regular bail to 23-year-old Abhishek Kumar in an Arms Act case, finding that he was arbitrarily named in the FIR despite being merely a pillion rider with no possession of arms and having been in custody for over eight months. The court allowed bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, as a warning chance under section 480(3) of B.N.S.S., 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts