RAVI PASWAN vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 88/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),353,353(2),76,302(2)3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
A.B.P - Anticipatory Bail Petition
CNR: BRRO010003952026
e-Filing Number
10-01-2026
Filing Number
363/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
88/2026
Registration Date
12-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Rohtas
Judge
3-District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
547
Police Station
DEHRI (TOWN)
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAVI PASWAN
Adv. Dip Narayan Singh
-
2.SHANKAR RAM
Adv. Dip Narayan Singh
-
3.SONAM DEVI
Adv. Dip Narayan Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
allowedView PDF
The court granted pre-arrest bail to the three petitioners in a case involving allegations of theft and assault under BNS sections 76 and 303(2). The court found the allegations largely bailable in nature, noted the existence of a counter-case suggesting mutual animosity, and observed that the complainant failed to provide medical evidence despite claiming injuries, treating the charges as exaggerated at this investigative stage. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
27-Feb-2026
Order
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
13-Feb-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
12-Feb-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
02-Feb-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
17-Jan-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
District And Additional Sessions Judge-1
-
15-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 88/2026
The court granted pre-arrest bail to the three petitioners in a case involving allegations of theft and assault under BNS sections 76 and 303(2). The court found the allegations largely bailable in nature, noted the existence of a counter-case suggesting mutual animosity, and observed that the complainant failed to provide medical evidence despite claiming injuries, treating the charges as exaggerated at this investigative stage. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts