RAVI PASWAN vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 88/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),353,353(2),76,302(2)3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

A.B.P - Anticipatory Bail Petition

CNR: BRRO010003952026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-01-2026

Filing Number

363/2026

Filing Date

12-01-2026

Registration No

88/2026

Registration Date

12-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Rohtas

Judge

3-DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-1

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

547

Police Station

DEHRI (TOWN)

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),353,353(2),76,302(2)3(5)
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482,

Petitioner(s)

RAVI PASWAN

Adv. Dip Narayan Singh

SHANKAR RAM

Adv. Dip Narayan Singh

SONAM DEVI

Adv. Dip Narayan Singh

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 3-DISTRICT AND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE-1

10-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

ORDER

13-02-2026

Awaiting for Case Diary

12-02-2026

Awaiting for Case Diary

02-02-2026

Awaiting for Case Diary

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
allowed

The court granted pre-arrest bail to the three petitioners in a case involving allegations of theft and assault under BNS sections 76 and 303(2). The court found the allegations largely bailable in nature, noted the existence of a counter-case suggesting mutual animosity, and observed that the complainant failed to provide medical evidence despite claiming injuries, treating the charges as exaggerated at this investigative stage. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted pre-arrest bail to the three petitioners in a case involving allegations of theft and assault under BNS sections 76 and 303(2). The court found the allegations largely bailable in nature, noted the existence of a counter-case suggesting mutual animosity, and observed that the complainant failed to provide medical evidence despite claiming injuries, treating the charges as exaggerated at this investigative stage. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DJ Div. Rohtas All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case