VIKAS, VIKASH KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 186/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,1,61,2,3,5. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPU010015122026
Filing Number
1408/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
186/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
PURNEA SADAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIKAS, VIKASH KUMAR
Adv. RISHAV ANAND
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary: Case 186/2026 - Vikash Kumar v. State of Bihar The Sessions Judge rejected Vikash Kumar's bail petition in a murder case where he stands accused of conspiring with others to kill Md. Afjal in a hotel room on 12.1.2026. The court found the allegations heinous, noting that the hotel room was booked in the petitioner's name, he was arrested at the scene, CCTV footage placed him there, and his confessional statement corroborated the prosecution's version with witness support. The investigation remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 186/2026
Summary: Case 186/2026 - Vikash Kumar v. State of Bihar The Sessions Judge rejected Vikash Kumar's bail petition in a murder case where he stands accused of conspiring with others to kill Md. Afjal in a hotel room on 12.1.2026. The court found the allegations heinous, noting that the hotel room was booked in the petitioner's name, he was arrested at the scene, CCTV footage placed him there, and his confessional statement corroborated the prosecution's version with witness support. The investigation remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts