MINOUTI DEVI, MINATI DEVI vs STATE OF BIHAR — 323/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,i,3,5. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPU010015032026

Filing Number

1400/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

323/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

30

Police Station

BAISI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,i,3,5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MINOUTI DEVI, MINATI DEVI

    Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court rejected Minouti Devi's anticipatory bail petition in a murder case. She was accused of conspiring with the deceased's husband to murder Parwati Devi, who had protested their alleged illicit relationship. The court found the allegations heinous in nature, noting the post-mortem report confirmed unnatural death by strangulation, and determined the investigation was still pending, making it unfit to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 323/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Minouti Devi's anticipatory bail petition in a murder case. She was accused of conspiring with the deceased's husband to murder Parwati Devi, who had protested their alleged illicit relationship. The court found the allegations heinous in nature, noting the post-mortem report confirmed unnatural death by strangulation, and determined the investigation was still pending, making it unfit to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case