MD SALAM, SALAM UDDIN vs STATE OF BIHAR — 256/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPU010011302026
Filing Number
1053/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
256/2026
Registration Date
06-02-2026
Court
DJ Div. Purnea
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MD SALAM, SALAM UDDIN
Adv. MOHAMMAD ZAHEER
BIBI BANO
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
GULSHAN AARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 27-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 16-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 07-02-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: ABP 256/2026 The Sessions Judge, Purnea granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Md. Salam and Bibi Bano in a dowry harassment case (IPC §498A, Dowry Protection Act §4), finding the case to be a matrimonial dispute with no specific allegations against them as in-laws. The court noted that the complainant resides separately with her parents while working, and the petitioners expressed willingness to receive her respectfully, supporting bail approval. Conditions: Bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, to be furnished within fortnight, with one surety from Purnea district. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: ABP 256/2026 The Sessions Judge, Purnea granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Md. Salam and Bibi Bano in a dowry harassment case (IPC §498A, Dowry Protection Act §4), finding the case to be a matrimonial dispute with no specific allegations against them as in-laws. The court noted that the complainant resides separately with her parents while working, and the petitioners expressed willingness to receive her respectfully, supporting bail approval. Conditions: Bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, to be furnished within fortnight, with one surety from Purnea district. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts