MD SALAM, SALAM UDDIN vs STATE OF BIHAR — 256/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPU010011302026

Filing Number

1053/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

256/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Purnea

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD SALAM, SALAM UDDIN

    Adv. MOHAMMAD ZAHEER

  2. 2.BIBI BANO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

  2. 2.GULSHAN AARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: ABP 256/2026 The Sessions Judge, Purnea granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Md. Salam and Bibi Bano in a dowry harassment case (IPC §498A, Dowry Protection Act §4), finding the case to be a matrimonial dispute with no specific allegations against them as in-laws. The court noted that the complainant resides separately with her parents while working, and the petitioners expressed willingness to receive her respectfully, supporting bail approval. Conditions: Bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, to be furnished within fortnight, with one surety from Purnea district. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 256/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABP 256/2026 The Sessions Judge, Purnea granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Md. Salam and Bibi Bano in a dowry harassment case (IPC §498A, Dowry Protection Act §4), finding the case to be a matrimonial dispute with no specific allegations against them as in-laws. The court noted that the complainant resides separately with her parents while working, and the petitioners expressed willingness to receive her respectfully, supporting bail approval. Conditions: Bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, to be furnished within fortnight, with one surety from Purnea district. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case