RAJ ANAND ALIAS VICKY KUMAR vs State of Bihar Advocate - Advocate — 20/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2), 318(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPA400001202026
Filing Number
90/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
20/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
Masaurhi DJ Division
Judge
2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
912
Police Station
MASAURHI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJ ANAND ALIAS VICKY KUMAR
Adv. SATISH RANJAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Advocate - Advocate
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order
The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Raj Anand @ Vikki Kumar, who was charged under BNS sections 316(2) and 318(4) in a land fraud case. The court found that while the main accused Ranjeet Kumar allegedly absconded after receiving payment for land, the petitioner was merely the land owner with the sale agreement, and all payments were made to the co-accused, warranting his release on a bail bond with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
24-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge-II
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 20/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Raj Anand @ Vikki Kumar, who was charged under BNS sections 316(2) and 318(4) in a land fraud case. The court found that while the main accused Ranjeet Kumar allegedly absconded after receiving payment for land, the petitioner was merely the land owner with the sale agreement, and all payments were made to the co-accused, warranting his release on a bail bond with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts