Roushan Paswan alias Roushan Kumar and others vs State of Bihar — 450/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(3),329(4),115(2),303(2),75,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 21st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRPA200013142026
Filing Number
1194/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
450/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
1-District and Additional Session Judge-I
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
93
Police Station
MANER
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Roushan Paswan alias Roushan Kumar and others
Adv. Swadesh Kumar Arya
-
2.Swaraj Paswan alias Swaraj Kumar
-
3.Shanker Paswan alias Shanker Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to all three petitioners (Roushan Paswan, Swaraj Paswan, and Shanker Paswan) in a case involving allegations of assault and theft under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court reasoned that the investigating officer's failure to produce the case diary despite court orders for over six weeks indicated insufficient evidence against the petitioners, and the six-week deadline for disposing anticipatory bail petitions had already expired. The petitioners were ordered released upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Session Judge-I
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Session Judge-I
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Session Judge-I
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 450/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to all three petitioners (Roushan Paswan, Swaraj Paswan, and Shanker Paswan) in a case involving allegations of assault and theft under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court reasoned that the investigating officer's failure to produce the case diary despite court orders for over six weeks indicated insufficient evidence against the petitioners, and the six-week deadline for disposing anticipatory bail petitions had already expired. The petitioners were ordered released upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts