Congress Kumar vs State of Bihar — 285/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 13th April 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPA200012632026
Filing Number
1157/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
285/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
61
Police Station
BIKRAM
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Congress Kumar
Adv. ANAND KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Copy of Order
The court rejected the bail application of Congress Kumar, who was accused of impersonating another candidate during the 2026 CTET examination. The judge found the allegations serious and not vague, involving systematic fraud with significant social impact, and determined that the investigation was still ongoing, making bail inappropriate at that stage. The court emphasized that this decision expressed no opinion on the case's merits at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
01-Apr-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 285/2026
The court rejected the bail application of Congress Kumar, who was accused of impersonating another candidate during the 2026 CTET examination. The judge found the allegations serious and not vague, involving systematic fraud with significant social impact, and determined that the investigation was still ongoing, making bail inappropriate at that stage. The court emphasized that this decision expressed no opinion on the case's merits at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts