Dhanu Tripathi alias Kaviranjan Kumar vs State of Bihar — 225/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304,317(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRPA200010432026

Filing Number

953/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

225/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304,317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dhanu Tripathi alias Kaviranjan Kumar

    Adv. Sunil Kumar Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Danapur granted bail to both petitioners (Dhanu Tripathi and Md. Tipu) in a mobile phone snatching case under sections 304 and 317(2) BNS. The court found the allegations general in nature, noted that no incriminating evidence was recovered from the petitioners' possession, and considered their clean antecedents. Each petitioner was ordered released on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, with a condition to remain present until charge is framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 225/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge-VII, Danapur granted bail to both petitioners (Dhanu Tripathi and Md. Tipu) in a mobile phone snatching case under sections 304 and 317(2) BNS. The court found the allegations general in nature, noted that no incriminating evidence was recovered from the petitioners' possession, and considered their clean antecedents. Each petitioner was ordered released on Rs. 10,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, with a condition to remain present until charge is framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case