Sushil Kumar alias Sumil Kumar paswan vs State of Bihar — 217/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109,117(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRPA200010292026
Filing Number
940/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
217/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Danapur
Judge
1-District and Additional Session Judge-I
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 04-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
222
Police Station
DULHIN BAZAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sushil Kumar alias Sumil Kumar paswan
Adv. Jitendra Prasad
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Sushil Kumar, who was in judicial custody since January 26, 2026, for alleged assault with an iron rod causing grievous injuries. The court considered the petitioner's clean antecedents, prolonged custody period, and the fact that a chargesheet had already been filed, concluding there was no risk of evidence tampering. Bail was granted upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties, subject to conditions including cooperation in investigation/trial and abstaining from similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Session Judge-I
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Session Judge-I
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Session Judge-I
-
25-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Additional Session Judge-I
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 217/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Sushil Kumar, who was in judicial custody since January 26, 2026, for alleged assault with an iron rod causing grievous injuries. The court considered the petitioner's clean antecedents, prolonged custody period, and the fact that a chargesheet had already been filed, concluding there was no risk of evidence tampering. Bail was granted upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties, subject to conditions including cooperation in investigation/trial and abstaining from similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts