Sushil Kumar alias Sumil Kumar paswan vs State of Bihar — 217/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109,117(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Regular Bail

CNR: BRPA200010292026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

940/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

217/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

1-District and Additional Session Judge-I

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

222

Police Station

DULHIN BAZAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(1),109,117(2),352,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

Sushil Kumar alias Sumil Kumar paswan

Adv. Jitendra Prasad

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Additional Session Judge-I

16-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

HEARING

07-03-2026

HEARING

25-02-2026

HEARING

18-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Order
16-03-2026
Copy of Order
16-03-2026
Copy of Order
16-03-2026
Copy of Order
16-03-2026
Copy of Order

The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Sushil Kumar, who was in judicial custody since January 26, 2026, for alleged assault with an iron rod causing grievous injuries. The court considered the petitioner's clean antecedents, prolonged custody period, and the fact that a chargesheet had already been filed, concluding there was no risk of evidence tampering. Bail was granted upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties, subject to conditions including cooperation in investigation/trial and abstaining from similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to Sushil Kumar, who was in judicial custody since January 26, 2026, for alleged assault with an iron rod causing grievous injuries. The court considered the petitioner's clean antecedents, prolonged custody period, and the fact that a chargesheet had already been filed, concluding there was no risk of evidence tampering. Bail was granted upon furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties, subject to conditions including cooperation in investigation/trial and abstaining from similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Danapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case