Roushan Vishwakarma and other vs State of Bihar — 253/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,379. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200007632026

Case disposed

Filing Number

711/2026

Filing Date

30-01-2026

Registration No

253/2026

Registration Date

30-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

1-District and Additional Session Judge-I

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

411

Police Station

BIHTA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,379

Petitioner(s)

Roushan Vishwakarma and other

Adv. Advocate

Kundan Kumar Alias Kundan Vishwakarma

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Additional Session Judge-I

17-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

HEARING

12-03-2026

HEARING

24-02-2026

HEARING

12-02-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

17-04-2026
Copy of Order

The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, Roushan and Kundan Vishwakarma, who faced charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, and 379 relating to a water park roller coaster repair dispute. The court found the prosecution's failure to produce the case diary for six weeks suggested no material evidence had been collected, and noted the alleged offences involved civil contract matters with sentences under seven years. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, Roushan and Kundan Vishwakarma, who faced charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, and 379 relating to a water park roller coaster repair dispute. The court found the prosecution's failure to produce the case diary for six weeks suggested no material evidence had been collected, and noted the alleged offences involved civil contract matters with sentences under seven years. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Danapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case