Roushan Vishwakarma and other vs State of Bihar — 253/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,379. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200007632026

Filing Number

711/2026

Filing Date

30-Jan-2026

Registration No

253/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

1-District and Additional Session Judge-I

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

411

Police Station

BIHTA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,379

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Roushan Vishwakarma and other

    Adv. Advocate

  2. 2.Kundan Kumar Alias Kundan Vishwakarma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, Roushan and Kundan Vishwakarma, who faced charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, and 379 relating to a water park roller coaster repair dispute. The court found the prosecution's failure to produce the case diary for six weeks suggested no material evidence had been collected, and noted the alleged offences involved civil contract matters with sentences under seven years. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Session Judge-I

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Session Judge-I

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Session Judge-I

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Session Judge-I

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Session Judge-I

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 253/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners, Roushan and Kundan Vishwakarma, who faced charges under IPC Sections 406, 420, and 379 relating to a water park roller coaster repair dispute. The court found the prosecution's failure to produce the case diary for six weeks suggested no material evidence had been collected, and noted the alleged offences involved civil contract matters with sentences under seven years. The petitioners were directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case