Aradhna Pandey and others vs State of Bihar — 195/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),306,303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200005472026

Case disposed

Filing Number

514/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

195/2026

Registration Date

22-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

179

Police Station

Neura

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),318(4),306,303(2),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Aradhna Pandey and others

Adv. Advocate

Sishir Mishra Shashi Prakash Mishra

Piyush Mishra

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- VII

12-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

HEARING

11-02-2026

HEARING

27-01-2026

HEARING

24-01-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Aradhna Pandey, Sishir Mishra, and Piyush Mishra) accused of illegally obtaining over ₹15 lakhs from students through online transfers in connection with S.S. College of Teacher Education. The court found that the main allegations were directed against Sachin Mishra (the primary accused and petitioner No. 1's husband), and following the *Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar* precedent, determined bail appropriate given the offenses carried sentences below seven years and the investigation officer's non-compliance with procedural directions. The petitioners were released on ₹10,000 bail bonds each with two sureties, subject to regular court attendance and cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Aradhna Pandey, Sishir Mishra, and Piyush Mishra) accused of illegally obtaining over ₹15 lakhs from students through online transfers in connection with S.S. College of Teacher Education. The court found that the main allegations were directed against Sachin Mishra (the primary accused and petitioner No. 1's husband), and following the *Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar* precedent, determined bail appropriate given the offenses carried sentences below seven years and the investigation officer's non-compliance with procedural directions. The petitioners were released on ₹10,000 bail bonds each with two sureties, subject to regular court attendance and cooperation in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Danapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case