Sanjeet Kumarand others vs State of Bihar — 125/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),117(2),109,303(2),351(2),351(3),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRPA200003122026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

290/2026

Filing Date

16-01-2026

Registration No

125/2026

Registration Date

16-01-2026

Court

DJ Div. Danapur

Judge

5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

BIKRAM

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),117(2),109,303(2),351(2),351(3),352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Sanjeet Kumarand others

Adv. Biresh Kumar

Bindeshwari Das

Prakash Das

Arti Kumari

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 5-District and Addl. Sessions Judge- IV

02-04-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

HEARING

24-03-2026

HEARING

16-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Copy of Order

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Rohit Kumar, Ajay Nat, and Savitri Devi) accused of assault, attempted outrage of modesty, and theft in a family dispute case. The court found that no incriminating evidence was discovered, all injuries were simple in nature, independent witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution case, and investigation was substantially complete, warranting pre-arrest bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Rohit Kumar, Ajay Nat, and Savitri Devi) accused of assault, attempted outrage of modesty, and theft in a family dispute case. The court found that no incriminating evidence was discovered, all injuries were simple in nature, independent witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution case, and investigation was substantially complete, warranting pre-arrest bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with sureties, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Danapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case