RAJESH KUMAR SINHA vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 2193/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),85,89,316,351(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th June 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail - ABP

CNR: BRPA010097472026

e-Filing Number

22-05-2026

Filing Number

9902/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

2193/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Court

DJ Div. Patna Sadar

Judge

122-Dasj II

Decision Date

20-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

39

Police Station

Mahila Thana

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),85,89,316,351(2),352,3(5)
Dowry Prohibition (D.p) Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KUMAR SINHA

    Adv. Nageshwar Prasad

  2. 2.PUJA SINHA

    Adv. Nageshwar Prasad

  3. 3.ANPURNA SINHA

    Adv. Nageshwar Prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Jun-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to all four petitioners in a dowry harassment case (FIR under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 89, 316, 351(2), 352, 3(5) and DP Act 3/4). For husband Raj Rajesh Kumar Nayan, bail was provisionally allowed for three months, conditioned on the couple living together happily; for the father-in-law, mother-in-law, and sister-in-law, bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, as the case diary contained no cogent evidence against them regarding dowry demands or torture allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj II

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj II

  5. 10-Jun-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj II

  6. 26-May-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj II

  7. 25-May-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj II

  8. 23-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2193/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to all four petitioners in a dowry harassment case (FIR under BNS sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 89, 316, 351(2), 352, 3(5) and DP Act 3/4). For husband Raj Rajesh Kumar Nayan, bail was provisionally allowed for three months, conditioned on the couple living together happily; for the father-in-law, mother-in-law, and sister-in-law, bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with sureties, as the case diary contained no cogent evidence against them regarding dowry demands or torture allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case