Raushan Kumar vs State of Bihar — 1007/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 419,420,467,468,471,120(b). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail - ABP
CNR: BRPA010047362026
e-Filing Number
11-03-2026
Filing Number
4123/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1007/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
135-DASJ XXXI
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
GANDHI MAIDAN
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raushan Kumar
Adv. Kedar Singh
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 135-DASJ XXXI
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
Awaiting for Case Diary
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 10-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 26-03-2026 | Awaiting for Case Diary |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary: The District and Additional Session Judge XXXI, Patna granted anticipatory bail to Raushan Kumar in a bank fraud case (Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 19/2021) involving charges of cheating and forgery. The court found that the petitioner had no criminal history, the case was registered during COVID-19 when physical bank account opening wasn't mandatory, and there was no flight risk. The petitioner was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each within three weeks of order communication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary: The District and Additional Session Judge XXXI, Patna granted anticipatory bail to Raushan Kumar in a bank fraud case (Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 19/2021) involving charges of cheating and forgery. The court found that the petitioner had no criminal history, the case was registered during COVID-19 when physical bank account opening wasn't mandatory, and there was no flight risk. The petitioner was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each within three weeks of order communication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts