Kumar Abhimanyu vs State of Bihar — 183/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,341,323,504. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 29th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail - ABP
CNR: BRPA010010442026
Filing Number
923/2026
Filing Date
15-Jan-2026
Registration No
183/2026
Registration Date
15-Jan-2026
Court
DJ Div. Patna Sadar
Judge
5-Dasj XXI
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1888
Police Station
Complaint Private
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kumar Abhimanyu
Adv. Saroj Kumar Upadhyay
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Patna granted anticipatory bail to Kumar Abhimanyu in a dowry harassment case (IPC Sections 498A, 504, 232, 241 and DP Act Sections 3-4). The court found dowry demand allegations were "general and omnibus," noted most offences were bailable, and applied Supreme Court precedents from Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including monthly maintenance payments of Rs. 5,000 to the complainant and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
Dasj XXI
-
28-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
25-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
21-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
15-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
09-Apr-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
19-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
24-Jan-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
17-Jan-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
-
17-Jan-2026
Hearing
Dasj XXI
-
16-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 183/2026
Court Decision Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Patna granted anticipatory bail to Kumar Abhimanyu in a dowry harassment case (IPC Sections 498A, 504, 232, 241 and DP Act Sections 3-4). The court found dowry demand allegations were "general and omnibus," noted most offences were bailable, and applied Supreme Court precedents from Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including monthly maintenance payments of Rs. 5,000 to the complainant and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts