MANJIT KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 635/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),111(4),61(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

ABP

CNR: BRNW010016442026

Filing Number

1484/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

635/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

10-2nd Dasj

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

442

Police Station

WARSALIGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340(2),111(4),61(2),3(5)
I.t. Act 2000 Section 66(B),66(d)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJIT KUMAR

    Adv. GAUTAM KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Nawada rejected Manjit Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a cyber fraud case. The court found direct and specific allegations against the petitioner for involvement in online cheating schemes posing as loan providers, supported by witness testimony, prior criminal antecedents (two cases in 2017), and recovery of incriminating mobile devices from the accused group. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Dasj

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    2nd Dasj

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 635/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The District & Additional Sessions Judge II, Nawada rejected Manjit Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a cyber fraud case. The court found direct and specific allegations against the petitioner for involvement in online cheating schemes posing as loan providers, supported by witness testimony, prior criminal antecedents (two cases in 2017), and recovery of incriminating mobile devices from the accused group. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case