SANNI KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR — 598/2026

Case under Arms Act Section 25(9),26,27. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

ABP

CNR: BRNW010015352026

Filing Number

1387/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

598/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

71

Police Station

PAKRIBARAWAN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Arms Act Section 25(9),26,27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANNI KUMAR

    Adv. bijay kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Nawada granted anticipatory bail to Sanni Kumar in connection with charges under Sections 25(9), 26, and 27 of the Arms Act. The court found that while a viral video allegedly showed the petitioner firing a rifle during a Tilak ceremony, no actual rifle or ammunition was recovered, no credible witness testimony supported the charges, and the petitioner had no criminal antecedent, leading the court to deem the allegations insufficient. The petitioner was released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to standard conditions including availability for interrogation and court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 598/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Nawada granted anticipatory bail to Sanni Kumar in connection with charges under Sections 25(9), 26, and 27 of the Arms Act. The court found that while a viral video allegedly showed the petitioner firing a rifle during a Tilak ceremony, no actual rifle or ammunition was recovered, no credible witness testimony supported the charges, and the petitioner had no criminal antecedent, leading the court to deem the allegations insufficient. The petitioner was released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to standard conditions including availability for interrogation and court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case