ISHTIYAK MIYAN URF MD ISHTIYAK URF AFTAB ALAM vs STATE OF BIHAR — 337/2026

Case under Indian Forest Act Section 33. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

BP

CNR: BRNW010014992026

Filing Number

1353/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

337/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Nawada

Judge

3-1st Dasj

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Forest Act Section 33
Wild Life Protection Act Section 27,29,30,31

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ISHTIYAK MIYAN URF MD ISHTIYAK URF AFTAB ALAM

    Adv. AMITABH RAJIV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Nawada rejected the bail petition of Ishtiyak Miyan, accused of illegal excavation in Savaiyatand reserve forest using explosives under the Indian Forest Act and Wildlife Protection Act. The court found the petitioner was named in the FIR, identified during police chase, has similar criminal antecedents, and the case involves serious allegations still under investigation. The petitioner may renew the bail application after charges are framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    1st Dasj

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    1st Dasj

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 337/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Nawada rejected the bail petition of Ishtiyak Miyan, accused of illegal excavation in Savaiyatand reserve forest using explosives under the Indian Forest Act and Wildlife Protection Act. The court found the petitioner was named in the FIR, identified during police chase, has similar criminal antecedents, and the case involves serious allegations still under investigation. The petitioner may renew the bail application after charges are framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case