ISHTIYAK MIYAN URF MD ISHTIYAK URF AFTAB ALAM vs STATE OF BIHAR — 337/2026
Case under Indian Forest Act Section 33. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 02nd April 2026.
BP
CNR: BRNW010014992026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1353/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
337/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Nawada
Judge
3-1st DASJ
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ISHTIYAK MIYAN URF MD ISHTIYAK URF AFTAB ALAM
Adv. AMITABH RAJIV
Respondent(s)
STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-1st DASJ
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 18-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 10-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Nawada rejected the bail petition of Ishtiyak Miyan, accused of illegal excavation in Savaiyatand reserve forest using explosives under the Indian Forest Act and Wildlife Protection Act. The court found the petitioner was named in the FIR, identified during police chase, has similar criminal antecedents, and the case involves serious allegations still under investigation. The petitioner may renew the bail application after charges are framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge at Nawada rejected the bail petition of Ishtiyak Miyan, accused of illegal excavation in Savaiyatand reserve forest using explosives under the Indian Forest Act and Wildlife Protection Act. The court found the petitioner was named in the FIR, identified during police chase, has similar criminal antecedents, and the case involves serious allegations still under investigation. The petitioner may renew the bail application after charges are framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts