Suraj Kumar vs State of bihar — 976/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366(A). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRMZ010034132026

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

3095/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

976/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

Muzaffarpur DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 363,366(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suraj Kumar

    Adv. Krishnadeo kumar

  2. 2.Urmila Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Principal District & Session Judge, Muzaffarpur granted pre-arrest bail to Suraj Kumar and Urmila Devi in a kidnapping case (IPC Sections 363, 366A) on the basis that the victim's statement confirmed she willingly went with Suraj Kumar and was never kidnapped, the accused were first-time offenders, and prosecution showed no apprehension of flight or re-offense. The court released them on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 976/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Session Judge, Muzaffarpur granted pre-arrest bail to Suraj Kumar and Urmila Devi in a kidnapping case (IPC Sections 363, 366A) on the basis that the victim's statement confirmed she willingly went with Suraj Kumar and was never kidnapped, the accused were first-time offenders, and prosecution showed no apprehension of flight or re-offense. The court released them on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and non-tampering with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case