Dharmendra Kumar vs State of bihar — 926/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 414,420,467,468,471,472,120(B)/34. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRMZ010032312026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

2929/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

926/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

Muzaffarpur DJ Div.

Judge

3-Dasj-1

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 24-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 414,420,467,468,471,472,120(B)/34
Arms Act Section 25(1-b)a,26,35

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dharmendra Kumar

    Adv. Vijay Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur granted anticipatory bail to Dharmendra Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 120(B), 34 and Arms Act sections 25(1-B), 26, 35. The court found that allegations against the petitioner were vague and omnibus, he was not named in the FIR, no incriminating material was recovered from him, and his name surfaced only through a co-accused's confessional statement. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, valid for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj-1

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-1

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 926/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur granted anticipatory bail to Dharmendra Kumar in a case involving charges under IPC sections 414, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 120(B), 34 and Arms Act sections 25(1-B), 26, 35. The court found that allegations against the petitioner were vague and omnibus, he was not named in the FIR, no incriminating material was recovered from him, and his name surfaced only through a co-accused's confessional statement. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, valid for four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case