CHANDIKA DEVI AND ORS vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 317/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366a. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRMP010014612026

Filing Number

1378/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

317/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Madhepura

Judge

29-District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

153

Police Station

SINGHESHWARASTHAN

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 366a
Code of Criminal Procedure Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDIKA DEVI AND ORS

    Adv. RAJESH NANDAN

  2. 2.ABHIMANNU KUMAR ALIAS MANNU KUMAR

  3. 3.SINTU KUMAR ALIAS PINTU KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the three petitioners (Chandrika Devi, Abhimannu Kumar, and Sintu Kumar) in a kidnapping case under Section 366A IPC. The court found that the victim's statement under Section 164 CrPC revealed she had voluntarily eloped and married the main accused, and did not implicate the petitioners, indicating they were falsely implicated due to family circumstances. The petitioners were ordered released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 317/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the three petitioners (Chandrika Devi, Abhimannu Kumar, and Sintu Kumar) in a kidnapping case under Section 366A IPC. The court found that the victim's statement under Section 164 CrPC revealed she had voluntarily eloped and married the main accused, and did not implicate the petitioners, indicating they were falsely implicated due to family circumstances. The petitioners were ordered released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case