CHANDIKA DEVI AND ORS vs THE STATE OF BIHAR — 317/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366a. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRMP010014612026
Filing Number
1378/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
317/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Madhepura
Judge
29-District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
153
Police Station
SINGHESHWARASTHAN
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDIKA DEVI AND ORS
Adv. RAJESH NANDAN
ABHIMANNU KUMAR ALIAS MANNU KUMAR
SINTU KUMAR ALIAS PINTU KUMAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 29-District and Additional Sessions Judge-VI
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the three petitioners (Chandrika Devi, Abhimannu Kumar, and Sintu Kumar) in a kidnapping case under Section 366A IPC. The court found that the victim's statement under Section 164 CrPC revealed she had voluntarily eloped and married the main accused, and did not implicate the petitioners, indicating they were falsely implicated due to family circumstances. The petitioners were ordered released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to the three petitioners (Chandrika Devi, Abhimannu Kumar, and Sintu Kumar) in a kidnapping case under Section 366A IPC. The court found that the victim's statement under Section 164 CrPC revealed she had voluntarily eloped and married the main accused, and did not implicate the petitioners, indicating they were falsely implicated due to family circumstances. The petitioners were ordered released on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts