Krishna Kumar Gupta vs The State of Bihar — 192/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRMB100007382026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

735/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

192/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jhanjharpur

Judge

11-Dasj-I

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

163

Police Station

LAUKAHA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Krishna Kumar Gupta

    Adv. Hari Prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected Krishna Kumar Gupta's anticipatory bail petition in a case registered under Section 64(1) of the BNS (sexual exploitation under pretext of marriage). The court found the prosecution's case credible based on the victim's statement and supporting witness testimonies in the case diary, concluding that the gravity and nature of the offense did not warrant granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Dasj-I

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  9. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Dasj-I

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 192/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Krishna Kumar Gupta's anticipatory bail petition in a case registered under Section 64(1) of the BNS (sexual exploitation under pretext of marriage). The court found the prosecution's case credible based on the victim's statement and supporting witness testimonies in the case diary, concluding that the gravity and nature of the offense did not warrant granting pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case