Laxmikant Choubey vs State of Bihar — 435/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 329(4),115(2),74,76,303(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
A B P - Anticipatoty Bail
CNR: BRKM010020422026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
1851/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
435/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bhabhua
Judge
1-Principal Distt and Sess Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 06-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
KUDRA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Laxmikant Choubey
Adv. Pramod Kumar Tiwari
-
2.Janki Devi
Adv. Pramod Kumar Tiwari
-
3.Priti Kumari
Adv. Pramod Kumar Tiwari
-
4.Chandramani Choubey
Adv. Pramod Kumar Tiwari
-
5.Chanchal Kumari alias Chamcham Kumari
Adv. Pramod Kumar Tiwari
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The Sessions Court at Kaimur allowed the anticipatory bail petition of Laxmikant Choubey and family members, who were accused of assault, theft, and outraging modesty in a January 2025 incident. The court found that the informant sustained no external injuries, the petitioners had no criminal antecedents, and the charges appeared to stem from an underlying land dispute, with serious charges lacking factual support. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 435/2026
The Sessions Court at Kaimur allowed the anticipatory bail petition of Laxmikant Choubey and family members, who were accused of assault, theft, and outraging modesty in a January 2025 incident. The court found that the informant sustained no external injuries, the petitioners had no criminal antecedents, and the charges appeared to stem from an underlying land dispute, with serious charges lacking factual support. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts