Putul Chaudhary alias Dhaneger Chaudhary vs State of Bihar — 307/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),109(2),303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th April 2026.
A B P - Anticipatoty Bail
CNR: BRKM010012162026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
1091/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
307/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bhabhua
Judge
1-Principal Distt and Sess Judge
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
45
Police Station
RAMGARH
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Putul Chaudhary alias Dhaneger Chaudhary
Adv. Amit Kumar Pandey
-
2.Manager Chaudhary
Adv. Amit Kumar Pandey
-
3.Deepak Kushwaha
Adv. Amit Kumar Pandey
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Case Summary: ABP No. 307/2026 The Sessions Judge at Kaimur granted anticipatory bail to Putul Chaudhary, Manager Chaudhary, and Deepak Kushwaha in an assault case arising from a quarrel on 11.02.2026. The court found the allegations against them general in nature, noted no specific overt acts, rejected the snatching charge as "super addition," and concluded insufficient grounds existed under Section 109 BNS. The petitioners were released on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 307/2026
Case Summary: ABP No. 307/2026 The Sessions Judge at Kaimur granted anticipatory bail to Putul Chaudhary, Manager Chaudhary, and Deepak Kushwaha in an assault case arising from a quarrel on 11.02.2026. The court found the allegations against them general in nature, noted no specific overt acts, rejected the snatching charge as "super addition," and concluded insufficient grounds existed under Section 109 BNS. The petitioners were released on bail of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts