Jagdish Kumar vs State of Bihar — 281/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.
A B P - Anticipatoty Bail
CNR: BRKM010010512026
Filing Number
941/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
281/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
DJ Div. Bhabhua
Judge
1-Principal Distt and Sess Judge
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
111
Police Station
BHABHUA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jagdish Kumar
Adv. Prahlad Singh
-
2.Sudha Devi
-
3.Diwakar Kumar
-
4.Prabhakar Kumar
-
5.Saroja Devi
-
6.Raushani Kumari
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail petition of six accused persons charged under sections 108 and 3(5) BNS in connection with a woman's death by poisoning. The court found merit in the petitioners' argument that the case may be based on a property dispute rather than criminal culpability, noting the informant's interest in claiming the deceased's husband's property. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
04-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal Distt and Sess Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 281/2026
The Sessions Judge allowed the anticipatory bail petition of six accused persons charged under sections 108 and 3(5) BNS in connection with a woman's death by poisoning. The court found merit in the petitioners' argument that the case may be based on a property dispute rather than criminal culpability, noting the informant's interest in claiming the deceased's husband's property. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each, subject to standard bail conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts