MD. JAMIL vs STATE OF BIHAR — 26/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),316(2),318(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRKI010001342026

Filing Number

114/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

26/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

DJ Div. Kishanganj

Judge

2-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),316(2),318(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. JAMIL

    Adv. SUNIL KUMAR JHA

  2. 2.RUMELA BIBI

  3. 3.RASEDA BEGUM

  4. 4.TANVEER ALAM

  5. 5.NUR MOHAMMAD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Case 26/2026 Summary The Sessions Judge, Kishanganj granted anticipatory bail to all five petitioners in a land dispute case. The court found the dispute to be civil in nature, involving family members who allegedly took money for land registration but failed to execute sale deeds. Despite the prosecution's opposition and petitioners 3, 4, and 5 having prior accusations, the court released them on bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds and sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 26/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 26/2026 Summary The Sessions Judge, Kishanganj granted anticipatory bail to all five petitioners in a land dispute case. The court found the dispute to be civil in nature, involving family members who allegedly took money for land registration but failed to execute sale deeds. Despite the prosecution's opposition and petitioners 3, 4, and 5 having prior accusations, the court released them on bail with Rs. 10,000 bonds and sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case