Pappu Devi vs State of Bihar — 358/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 12692),115(2),74,303(2),109(1),352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 11th March 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRJE010019512026
Filing Number
1747/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
358/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Jehanabad DJ Div
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
PALI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pappu Devi
Adv. Ajay Kumar
-
2.Bikki Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge, Jehanabad rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Pappu Devi and Bikki Kumar. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of their active participation in assaulting the informant on 25.01.2026, supported by injury reports and witness statements under investigation for offences including criminal intimidation, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 303(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), and 3(5) of BNS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 358/2026
Summary The Sessions Judge, Jehanabad rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Pappu Devi and Bikki Kumar. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of their active participation in assaulting the informant on 25.01.2026, supported by injury reports and witness statements under investigation for offences including criminal intimidation, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation under IPC sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 303(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), and 3(5) of BNS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts