Surajdeo Singh alias Suraj vs State of Bihar — 351/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),109(1),351(2),3(5),352. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRJE010019282026

Filing Number

1724/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

351/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Jehanabad DJ Div

Judge

3-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

4

Police Station

Barabar Paryatan

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),126(2),109(1),351(2),3(5),352

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Surajdeo Singh alias Suraj

    Adv. SRI RITURAJ SWAMI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge, Jehanabad rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Surjdeo Singh @ Suraj in a case involving charges under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), and 3(5) B.N.S. The court found the allegations serious, noting specific evidence of assault with an iron rod causing head fractures with repeated blows on vital body parts, supported by witness statements and injury reports, making it unfit for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 351/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Jehanabad rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Surjdeo Singh @ Suraj in a case involving charges under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), and 3(5) B.N.S. The court found the allegations serious, noting specific evidence of assault with an iron rod causing head fractures with repeated blows on vital body parts, supported by witness statements and injury reports, making it unfit for anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case