AMIT KUMAR RANJAN vs STATE OF BIHAR — 332/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),338,336(3),340(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 19th May 2026.
ANTICIPATORY BAIL
CNR: BRJA010015812026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
1454/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
332/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Jamui
Judge
15-District And Additional Sessions Judge V, Jamui
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
100
Police Station
JHAJHA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMIT KUMAR RANJAN
Adv. Sudhir Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Bail OrderView PDF
Case 332/2026 Summary Decision: The court dismissed Amit Kumar Ranjan's anticipatory bail application. The court found that the allegations of deliberately and illegally approving 69 mutation cases involving Gairmajarua Khata land in connivance with co-accused officers constituted a well-planned criminal conspiracy causing financial loss to the government, making this an unsuitable case for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
Disposed
District And Additional Sessions Judge V, Jamui
-
15-May-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge V, Jamui
-
05-May-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge V, Jamui
-
27-Apr-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge V, Jamui
-
23-Apr-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge V, Jamui
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge V, Jamui
-
08-Apr-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge V, Jamui
-
02-Apr-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge V, Jamui
-
24-Mar-2026
Hearing.
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing.
District And Additional Sessions Judge V, Jamui
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 332/2026
Case 332/2026 Summary Decision: The court dismissed Amit Kumar Ranjan's anticipatory bail application. The court found that the allegations of deliberately and illegally approving 69 mutation cases involving Gairmajarua Khata land in connivance with co-accused officers constituted a well-planned criminal conspiracy causing financial loss to the government, making this an unsuitable case for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts