BABAN KUMAR ALIAS BABAN KUMAR RAWAT vs STATE OFD BIHAR — 326/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,85,3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRJA010015482026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

1429/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

326/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 27-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

165

Police Station

BARHAT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,85,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABAN KUMAR ALIAS BABAN KUMAR RAWAT

    Adv. Makeshwar Prasad Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OFD BIHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary (ABA No. 326/2026): Baban Kumar Rawat's anticipatory bail petition was rejected. The petitioner sought bail in a murder case (Barhat P.S. Case 165/2025) where he stands accused under BNS Sections 103 and 85 read with 3(5). The prosecution alleges that he murdered his wife Aradhna Kumari by strangulation following a domestic dispute involving dowry demands. The court found the serious murder allegation credible, noted the petitioner's criminal antecedent, and his status as the deceased's husband, concluding grounds for anticipatory bail were insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 326/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (ABA No. 326/2026): Baban Kumar Rawat's anticipatory bail petition was rejected. The petitioner sought bail in a murder case (Barhat P.S. Case 165/2025) where he stands accused under BNS Sections 103 and 85 read with 3(5). The prosecution alleges that he murdered his wife Aradhna Kumari by strangulation following a domestic dispute involving dowry demands. The court found the serious murder allegation credible, noted the petitioner's criminal antecedent, and his status as the deceased's husband, concluding grounds for anticipatory bail were insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case