BHOLA YADAV AND 3 OTHERS vs STATE OF BIHAR — 302/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),74,108,352,351(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th May 2026.

ANTICIPATORY BAIL

CNR: BRJA010014322026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

1322/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

302/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Jamui

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

Decision Date

16th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

MALAYPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),74,108,352,351(2),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

BHOLA YADAV AND 3 OTHERS

Adv. ANKIT RAJ

SHAILENDRA YADAV

Adv. ANKIT RAJ

RAJ KUMAR YADAV

Adv. ANKIT RAJ

ARJUN YADAV

Adv. ANKIT RAJ

Respondent(s)

STATE OF BIHAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui

16-05-2026

Disposed

12-05-2026

HEARING.

08-05-2026

HEARING.

02-05-2026

HEARING.

23-04-2026

HEARING.

Final Orders / Judgements

16-05-2026
Bail Order

Case Summary: ABA No. 302/2026 Decision: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Bhola Yadav, Shailendra Yadav, Raj Kumar Yadav, and Arjun Yadav. The Principal District & Sessions Judge found that the nature of grievous injuries sustained by the informant and his parents, combined with serious allegations of armed assault arising from a land dispute, warranted denial of pre-arrest bail protection to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA No. 302/2026 Decision: The court rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Bhola Yadav, Shailendra Yadav, Raj Kumar Yadav, and Arjun Yadav. The Principal District & Sessions Judge found that the nature of grievous injuries sustained by the informant and his parents, combined with serious allegations of armed assault arising from a land dispute, warranted denial of pre-arrest bail protection to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Jamui All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case