SAMPURNA RAWAT vs State of Bihar — 593/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126,2,1145,2,117,2,118,1,109,303,2,351,2,352,3/5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010037292026

Case disposed

Filing Number

3546/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

593/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

GOPALPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126,2,1145,2,117,2,118,1,109,303,2,351,2,352,3/5

Petitioner(s)

SAMPURNA RAWAT

Adv. KHAJANCHI MISHRA

LAXMINA DEVI

PAPPU RAWAT

DILIP RAWAT ALIS DILIP KUMAR

DHANANJAY RAWAT ALIS DHANAJAY KUMAR

DHANESH RAWAT

UMESH RAWAT ALIS PAPPU

ARBINDA RAWAT ALIS ARVIND KUMAR

SANDESH RAWAT

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

01-04-2026

Disposed

19-03-2026

ADMISSION

12-03-2026

ADMISSION

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Order

Court Decision Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj granted anticipatory bail to nine petitioners accused of assault, theft, and criminal intimidation. The court found that while the petitioners were named in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against them individually, injuries were simple in nature, and independent witnesses attributed the incident to a quarrel between children. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties each, conditioned on cooperation in investigation/trial and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj granted anticipatory bail to nine petitioners accused of assault, theft, and criminal intimidation. The court found that while the petitioners were named in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against them individually, injuries were simple in nature, and independent witnesses attributed the incident to a quarrel between children. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties each, conditioned on cooperation in investigation/trial and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Gopalganj All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case