SAMPURNA RAWAT vs State of Bihar — 593/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126,2,1145,2,117,2,118,1,109,303,2,351,2,352,3/5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010037292026

Filing Number

3546/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

593/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

GOPALPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126,2,1145,2,117,2,118,1,109,303,2,351,2,352,3/5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAMPURNA RAWAT

    Adv. KHAJANCHI MISHRA

  2. 2.LAXMINA DEVI

  3. 3.PAPPU RAWAT

  4. 4.DILIP RAWAT ALIS DILIP KUMAR

  5. 5.DHANANJAY RAWAT ALIS DHANAJAY KUMAR

  6. 6.DHANESH RAWAT

  7. 7.UMESH RAWAT ALIS PAPPU

  8. 8.ARBINDA RAWAT ALIS ARVIND KUMAR

  9. 9.SANDESH RAWAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj granted anticipatory bail to nine petitioners accused of assault, theft, and criminal intimidation. The court found that while the petitioners were named in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against them individually, injuries were simple in nature, and independent witnesses attributed the incident to a quarrel between children. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties each, conditioned on cooperation in investigation/trial and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 593/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary: The Principal Sessions Judge, Gopalganj granted anticipatory bail to nine petitioners accused of assault, theft, and criminal intimidation. The court found that while the petitioners were named in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against them individually, injuries were simple in nature, and independent witnesses attributed the incident to a quarrel between children. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bonds with two sureties each, conditioned on cooperation in investigation/trial and non-tampering with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case