DHANANJAI SAH vs State of Bihar — 209/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80/2,3/5. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRGO010035802026
Filing Number
3401/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
209/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
3-ADJ-I
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
PHULWARIA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHANANJAI SAH
Adv. IMRAN ALAM
RANJU DEVI
SACHIN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-ADJ-I
Disposed
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 11-03-2026 | ADMISSION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj rejected the bail petition of three accused (Dhananjay Sah, Ranju Devi, and Sachin Kumar Gupta) in a dowry death case. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence against the petitioners, including witness statements and ligature marks on the deceased's neck, establishing their involvement in allegedly killing the informant's daughter for failure to provide a car as dowry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District & Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj rejected the bail petition of three accused (Dhananjay Sah, Ranju Devi, and Sachin Kumar Gupta) in a dowry death case. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence against the petitioners, including witness statements and ligature marks on the deceased's neck, establishing their involvement in allegedly killing the informant's daughter for failure to provide a car as dowry. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts