BULET SINGH vs State of Bihar — 207/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 399,402,412,34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGO010035772026

Filing Number

3398/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

207/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

24-ADJ-IX

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 18-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

87

Police Station

KUCHAIKOT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 399,402,412,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BULET SINGH

    Adv. NITESH CHOUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge IX, Gopalganj, rejected the regular bail application of Bullet Singh in a case involving serious charges under IPC Sections 399, 402, 412/34 and Arms Act Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35. The court found that while there was no specific allegation directly against the petitioner, the involvement of non-bailable offences, the petitioner's criminal history of similar nature, ongoing investigation status, and the serious nature of the allegations (murder, loot, extortion, illegal weapons) warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-IX

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-IX

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Awaiting for Case Diary

    ADJ-IX

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 207/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The District & Additional Sessions Judge IX, Gopalganj, rejected the regular bail application of Bullet Singh in a case involving serious charges under IPC Sections 399, 402, 412/34 and Arms Act Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 35. The court found that while there was no specific allegation directly against the petitioner, the involvement of non-bailable offences, the petitioner's criminal history of similar nature, ongoing investigation status, and the serious nature of the allegations (murder, loot, extortion, illegal weapons) warranted continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case