RAM PRABHAWATI DEVI vs State of Bihar — 564/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,1,109,1,351,2,3,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010034322026

Filing Number

3262/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

564/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

3-ADJ-I

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

426

Police Station

KATAIYA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,1,109,1,351,2,3,5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM PRABHAWATI DEVI

    Adv. GUDDU KR. SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The District and Additional Sessions Court in Gopalganj granted anticipatory bail to Ram Prabhawati Devi in a case involving a land-related dispute that resulted in a mutual altercation between parties. The court found no specific and direct allegations against the petitioner (who has no criminal record), noted that co-accused persons had already been granted bail, and determined it was a fit case for bail. The petitioner was released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, valid within four weeks of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ-I

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Admission

    ADJ-I

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 564/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District and Additional Sessions Court in Gopalganj granted anticipatory bail to Ram Prabhawati Devi in a case involving a land-related dispute that resulted in a mutual altercation between parties. The court found no specific and direct allegations against the petitioner (who has no criminal record), noted that co-accused persons had already been granted bail, and determined it was a fit case for bail. The petitioner was released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, valid within four weeks of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case