RAHUL KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 549/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,1,117,2,109,351,2,352,33,3,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGO010033062026
Filing Number
3139/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
549/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Gopalganj
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
58
Police Station
GOPALPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAHUL KUMAR
Adv. SHATRU AJAT
MADHU KMARI
SAPNA KUMARI
ABHINANDAN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 04-04-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 12-03-2026 | ADMISSION |
| 07-03-2026 | ADMISSION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Madhu Kumari, Sapna Kumari, and Abhinandan Kumar in a case involving alleged assault and criminal intimidation. The court found that while the petitioners were named in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against them, injuries were simple in nature, and they had no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, with conditions to cooperate in investigation and not tamper with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Madhu Kumari, Sapna Kumari, and Abhinandan Kumar in a case involving alleged assault and criminal intimidation. The court found that while the petitioners were named in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against them, injuries were simple in nature, and they had no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, with conditions to cooperate in investigation and not tamper with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts