RAHUL KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 549/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,1,117,2,109,351,2,352,33,3,5. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGO010033062026

Filing Number

3139/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

549/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Gopalganj

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

GOPALPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126,2,115,2,118,1,117,2,109,351,2,352,33,3,5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL KUMAR

    Adv. SHATRU AJAT

  2. 2.MADHU KMARI

  3. 3.SAPNA KUMARI

  4. 4.ABHINANDAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Order

    Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Madhu Kumari, Sapna Kumari, and Abhinandan Kumar in a case involving alleged assault and criminal intimidation. The court found that while the petitioners were named in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against them, injuries were simple in nature, and they had no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, with conditions to cooperate in investigation and not tamper with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Admission

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 549/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Madhu Kumari, Sapna Kumari, and Abhinandan Kumar in a case involving alleged assault and criminal intimidation. The court found that while the petitioners were named in the FIR, there were no specific allegations against them, injuries were simple in nature, and they had no criminal antecedents. The petitioners were granted bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties each, with conditions to cooperate in investigation and not tamper with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case