GOBIND PASWAN ALIAS GOBIND KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH — 449/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 366(A),34. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BRGA010042752026

Filing Number

4079/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

449/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

210

Police Station

DELHA

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 366(A),34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOBIND PASWAN ALIAS GOBIND KUMAR

    Adv. PRAMOD KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Gobind Paswan's bail petition in a kidnapping/abduction case (IPC §366(a)). The court found credible evidence including the victim's consistent statements to police and judicial magistrate alleging the petitioner kidnapped her with co-accused intent to marry her, took her to multiple states, and demanded ransom. Considering the grave nature of allegations, consistent victim testimony, submitted chargesheet, and prior bail rejections for co-accused, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Bail Matters

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  5. 13-Apr-2026

    Bail Matters

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Bail Matters

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Bail Matters

    District and Additional Sessions Judge-I

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 449/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Gobind Paswan's bail petition in a kidnapping/abduction case (IPC §366(a)). The court found credible evidence including the victim's consistent statements to police and judicial magistrate alleging the petitioner kidnapped her with co-accused intent to marry her, took her to multiple states, and demanded ransom. Considering the grave nature of allegations, consistent victim testimony, submitted chargesheet, and prior bail rejections for co-accused, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case