ROHIT KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 899/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),110,352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRGA010040522026

Filing Number

3862/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

899/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Gaya DJ Div.

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

35

Police Station

Mahkar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),303(2),110,352,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT KUMAR

    Adv. MD.SHAH ALAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Sessions Court, Gayaji granted anticipatory bail to Rohit Kumar in a land dispute case involving alleged damage to an irrigation pipe and resulting scuffle. The court allowed the bail application based on the parties' settlement, the insignificant nature of injuries caused, and the prior grant of bail to co-accused under similar circumstances. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount within two weeks of arrest or voluntary surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 899/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Sessions Court, Gayaji granted anticipatory bail to Rohit Kumar in a land dispute case involving alleged damage to an irrigation pipe and resulting scuffle. The court allowed the bail application based on the parties' settlement, the insignificant nature of injuries caused, and the prior grant of bail to co-accused under similar circumstances. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount within two weeks of arrest or voluntary surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case