SHANKAR KUMAR vs STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA — 529/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),109,329(4),324(4),75,303(2),352,351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 15th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRGA010022872026
Filing Number
2179/2026
Filing Date
05-Feb-2026
Registration No
529/2026
Registration Date
05-Feb-2026
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
4-District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
239
Police Station
Neemchak Bathani
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANKAR KUMAR
Adv. PRAMOD KUMAR DWIVEDI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH Advocate - PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GAYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 529/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gaya rejected Shankar Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged criminal intimidation, assault, and theft. The court found that the petitioner was named in the FIR with credible witness support for serious offences including grievous injury to multiple victims, and noted that similar co-accused had already been denied bail; with investigation ongoing, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
24-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
12-Mar-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
20-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
10-Feb-2026
Bail Matters
District and Additional Sessions Judge-I
-
07-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 529/2026
Case Summary: 529/2026 The Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gaya rejected Shankar Kumar's anticipatory bail petition in a case involving alleged criminal intimidation, assault, and theft. The court found that the petitioner was named in the FIR with credible witness support for serious offences including grievous injury to multiple victims, and noted that similar co-accused had already been denied bail; with investigation ongoing, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts