CHINTU RAM vs STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS — 1/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 397,399. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: BRGA010005812025
Filing Number
560/2025
Filing Date
08-Jan-2025
Registration No
1/2025
Registration Date
08-Jan-2025
Court
Gaya DJ Div.
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
241
Police Station
CHANDAUTI
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHINTU RAM
Adv. KAILASH ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS
-
2.RAJNATH PRAJAPATI
-
3.SAHIL KUMAR
-
4.AMIT KUMAR @ MANO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The Sessions Judge allowed the revision petition and set aside the lower court's order, holding that when a police report exonerates some accused persons, the Judicial Magistrate must mandatorily provide notice and opportunity of hearing to the informant before accepting such report. The court reasoned that exonerating accused amounts to filing a final report affecting the informant's interests, and remitted the matter back to the Magistrate for fresh consideration with proper notice to the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Order
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Oct-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Jul-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jul-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jun-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Jun-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-May-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-May-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Apr-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Mar-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2025
Hearing
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Feb-2025
addmission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
05-Feb-2025
addmission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Jan-2025
addmission
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2025
Summary The Sessions Judge allowed the revision petition and set aside the lower court's order, holding that when a police report exonerates some accused persons, the Judicial Magistrate must mandatorily provide notice and opportunity of hearing to the informant before accepting such report. The court reasoned that exonerating accused amounts to filing a final report affecting the informant's interests, and remitted the matter back to the Magistrate for fresh consideration with proper notice to the informant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts