VANDANA KUMARI vs State of Bihar — 1390/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 04th April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BREC010046812026
Filing Number
4349/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
1390/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
RAM GARHWA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VANDANA KUMARI
Adv. RUPNARAYAN YADAV
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and sessions Judge
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vandana Kumari, who is accused of murdering her husband Jitendra Kumar (son of the informant) along with others under sections 103(1), 61(2), 303(2), and 3(5) of the BNS. The court found credible materials in the case diary, including corroborating statements from the informant and witnesses, which supported the allegations despite the post-mortem showing no external injuries and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent. The court deemed the nature of allegations and available evidence sufficient to deny pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Vandana Kumari, who is accused of murdering her husband Jitendra Kumar (son of the informant) along with others under sections 103(1), 61(2), 303(2), and 3(5) of the BNS. The court found credible materials in the case diary, including corroborating statements from the informant and witnesses, which supported the allegations despite the post-mortem showing no external injuries and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent. The court deemed the nature of allegations and available evidence sufficient to deny pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts