DHANOJ RIA vs State of Bihar — 667/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 28th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BREC010046152026
Filing Number
4283/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
667/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DJ Div. Motihari
Judge
8-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 4th
Decision Date
28th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
235
Police Station
GHORASAHAN
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHANOJ RIA
Adv. Rajeev Kumar Dwivedi alias Pappu Dubey
Respondent(s)
State of Bihar
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 4th
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Dhanoj Rai in a case involving alleged assault with weapons. The court found that since the charge sheet was already filed, no custodial interrogation was needed, and crucially, both parties had compromised the case with the informant appearing in court to support the settlement and confirm injuries were non-serious. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on condition that one bailor be a close relative and the petitioner undertake not to commit similar offences or tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Dhanoj Rai in a case involving alleged assault with weapons. The court found that since the charge sheet was already filed, no custodial interrogation was needed, and crucially, both parties had compromised the case with the informant appearing in court to support the settlement and confirm injuries were non-serious. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on condition that one bailor be a close relative and the petitioner undertake not to commit similar offences or tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts