DHANOJ RIA vs State of Bihar — 667/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010046152026

Filing Number

4283/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

667/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

8-District and Addl. Sessions Judge 4th

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

235

Police Station

GHORASAHAN

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHANOJ RIA

    Adv. Rajeev Kumar Dwivedi alias Pappu Dubey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Dhanoj Rai in a case involving alleged assault with weapons. The court found that since the charge sheet was already filed, no custodial interrogation was needed, and crucially, both parties had compromised the case with the informant appearing in court to support the settlement and confirm injuries were non-serious. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on condition that one bailor be a close relative and the petitioner undertake not to commit similar offences or tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 4th

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 4th

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge 4th

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 667/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge granted bail to accused Dhanoj Rai in a case involving alleged assault with weapons. The court found that since the charge sheet was already filed, no custodial interrogation was needed, and crucially, both parties had compromised the case with the informant appearing in court to support the settlement and confirm injuries were non-serious. The petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on condition that one bailor be a close relative and the petitioner undertake not to commit similar offences or tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case