AMIT KUMAR ALIAS AMIT KUMAR vs State of Bihar — 1222/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 04th April 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BREC010040972026

Filing Number

3805/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

1222/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

04-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

26

Police Station

CHIRAIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIT KUMAR ALIAS AMIT KUMAR

    Adv. SUJIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Apr-2026

    Order By Court

    The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Amit Kumar, who was accused of photographing the informant's niece, extorting ₹10,000 as "rangdari," abusing the informant, and firing at him. The court found the allegations credible based on the FIR, the informant's re-statement, and witness corroboration in the case diary, determining it was not a fit case for anticipatory bail despite the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by Amit Kumar, who was accused of photographing the informant's niece, extorting ₹10,000 as "rangdari," abusing the informant, and firing at him. The court found the allegations credible based on the FIR, the informant's re-statement, and witness corroboration in the case diary, determining it was not a fit case for anticipatory bail despite the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case