ANIL RAY AND ORS vs State of Bihar — 569/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Regular Bail

CNR: BREC010039232026

Filing Number

3640/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

569/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

DJ Div. Motihari

Judge

1-Principal District and sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 23-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

588

Police Station

CHIRAIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL RAY AND ORS

    Adv. RAN VIJAY NARAYAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order By CourtView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Anil Ray and Sabresh Kumar Ray, accused of theft of 948 bags of rice worth Rs. 6,80,308. The court found that the petitioners had confessed their involvement in confessional statements, possessed seven prior criminal antecedents, and the investigation remained ongoing, warranting continued judicial custody. The petitioners may renew their bail application after formal charges are framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District and sessions Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 569/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Judge rejected the bail petition of Anil Ray and Sabresh Kumar Ray, accused of theft of 948 bags of rice worth Rs. 6,80,308. The court found that the petitioners had confessed their involvement in confessional statements, possessed seven prior criminal antecedents, and the investigation remained ongoing, warranting continued judicial custody. The petitioners may renew their bail application after formal charges are framed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case