MD RAJA vs State of Bihar — 401/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),324(4),109,303(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA010021712026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

2017/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

401/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

96

Police Station

BHALPATTI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),324(4),109,303(2),352,351(2)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

MD RAJA

Adv. Md. Islam

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

24-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

07-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Copy of order

The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the pre-arrest bail petition of Md. Raja in connection with charges of criminal intimidation, criminal intimidation by threat, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation by threat to cause death or grievous hurt, along with Arms Act violations. The court found the allegations serious, noting recovery of pellets from the crime scene and seized JCB machinery, witness corroboration, and the petitioner's criminal antecedent, thereby denying anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the pre-arrest bail petition of Md. Raja in connection with charges of criminal intimidation, criminal intimidation by threat, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation by threat to cause death or grievous hurt, along with Arms Act violations. The court found the allegations serious, noting recovery of pellets from the crime scene and seized JCB machinery, witness corroboration, and the petitioner's criminal antecedent, thereby denying anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Darbhanga All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case