MD RAJA vs State of Bihar — 401/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),324(4),109,303(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRDA010021712026

Filing Number

2017/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

401/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ Div. Darbhanga

Judge

2-District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 25-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

96

Police Station

BHALPATTI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),190,126(2),115(2),324(4),109,303(2),352,351(2)
Arms Act Section 27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD RAJA

    Adv. Md. Islam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Bihar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of orderView PDF

    The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the pre-arrest bail petition of Md. Raja in connection with charges of criminal intimidation, criminal intimidation by threat, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation by threat to cause death or grievous hurt, along with Arms Act violations. The court found the allegations serious, noting recovery of pellets from the crime scene and seized JCB machinery, witness corroboration, and the petitioner's criminal antecedent, thereby denying anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Addl. Sessions Judge-I

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 401/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Darbhanga rejected the pre-arrest bail petition of Md. Raja in connection with charges of criminal intimidation, criminal intimidation by threat, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation by threat to cause death or grievous hurt, along with Arms Act violations. The court found the allegations serious, noting recovery of pellets from the crime scene and seized JCB machinery, witness corroboration, and the petitioner's criminal antecedent, thereby denying anticipatory bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case