Subedar Yadav Aliase Subedar Singh vs State of Bihar — 288/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),329(3),115(2),74,303(2),352,351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st April 2026.
Anticipatory Bail
CNR: BRBU100017282026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
1514/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
288/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
DJ Div. Buxar
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 25-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
BUXAR INDUSTRIAL
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Subedar Yadav Aliase Subedar Singh
Adv. Laxman Jee Rai
-
2.Tejnarayan Yadav Aliase Tejnarayan Singh
Adv. Laxman Jee Rai
-
3.Nandlesh Kumar Aliase Jhammu Kumar Yadav
Adv. Laxman Jee Rai
-
4.Nitish Kumar Yadav
Adv. Laxman Jee Rai
-
5.Rajnish Kumar Yadav
Adv. Laxman Jee Rai
-
6.Anish Kumar Yadav
Adv. Laxman Jee Rai
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Copy of orderView PDF
Court Decision Summary: The Sessions Court, Buxar rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by six petitioners accused of assault, wrongful restraint, and theft under various BNS sections in connection with an incident on 14.02.2025. The court found the nature and seriousness of the offence sufficient to deny anticipatory bail, directing the petitioners to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail, which will be decided per Supreme Court guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
26-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 288/2026
Court Decision Summary: The Sessions Court, Buxar rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by six petitioners accused of assault, wrongful restraint, and theft under various BNS sections in connection with an incident on 14.02.2025. The court found the nature and seriousness of the offence sufficient to deny anticipatory bail, directing the petitioners to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail, which will be decided per Supreme Court guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts