Subedar Yadav Aliase Subedar Singh vs State of Bihar — 288/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),329(3),115(2),74,303(2),352,351(2),351(3),3(5). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 01st April 2026.

Anticipatory Bail

CNR: BRBU100017282026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

1514/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

288/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

DJ Div. Buxar

Judge

1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

BUXAR INDUSTRIAL

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),329(3),115(2),74,303(2),352,351(2),351(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Subedar Yadav Aliase Subedar Singh

Adv. Laxman Jee Rai

Tejnarayan Yadav Aliase Tejnarayan Singh

Adv. Laxman Jee Rai

Nandlesh Kumar Aliase Jhammu Kumar Yadav

Adv. Laxman Jee Rai

Nitish Kumar Yadav

Adv. Laxman Jee Rai

Rajnish Kumar Yadav

Adv. Laxman Jee Rai

Anish Kumar Yadav

Adv. Laxman Jee Rai

Respondent(s)

State of Bihar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge

01-04-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

HEARING

18-03-2026

HEARING

11-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Copy of order

Court Decision Summary: The Sessions Court, Buxar rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by six petitioners accused of assault, wrongful restraint, and theft under various BNS sections in connection with an incident on 14.02.2025. The court found the nature and seriousness of the offence sufficient to deny anticipatory bail, directing the petitioners to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail, which will be decided per Supreme Court guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary: The Sessions Court, Buxar rejected the anticipatory bail petition filed by six petitioners accused of assault, wrongful restraint, and theft under various BNS sections in connection with an incident on 14.02.2025. The court found the nature and seriousness of the offence sufficient to deny anticipatory bail, directing the petitioners to surrender before the trial court and seek regular bail, which will be decided per Supreme Court guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ Div. Buxar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case