samidan khatun and others vs State of Bihar Others calctor ara bhojpur Advocate - m. rahman — 64/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
Title Suit
CNR: BRBJ220000322015
Filing Number
64/2015
Filing Date
21-Nov-2015
Registration No
64/2015
Registration Date
21-Nov-2015
Court
Piro Civil Division
Judge
1-Sub judge-I
Last updated 18-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.samidan khatun and others
Adv. trilokinath singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar Others calctor ara bhojpur Advocate - m. rahman
Case History
-
20-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
02-Apr-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
24-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
17-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
13-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
09-Mar-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
26-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
17-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
16-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
12-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
09-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
05-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
02-Feb-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
29-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
19-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
15-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
13-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
07-Jan-2026
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
24-Dec-2025
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
16-Dec-2025
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
10-Dec-2025
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
04-Dec-2025
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
25-Nov-2025
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
18-Nov-2025
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
04-Nov-2025
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
10-Oct-2025
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
23-Sep-2025
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
15-Sep-2025
Arguments
Sub judge-I
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
19-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
07-Jul-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
02-Jun-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
19-May-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary: The court allowed the intervention petition filed by Imamuddun and three others, permitting them to be made parties to the suit. The court found their presence essential for effective adjudication of the land title dispute, as they claim to be legal heirs of the original khatiyani raiyat and their claims directly affect the suit's outcome. The petition was granted with costs of Rs. 600/-. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
13-May-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
28-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
27-Feb-2025
Evidence
-
16-Jan-2025
Evidence
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence
-
11-Dec-2024
Documents
-
28-Nov-2024
Documents
-
08-Oct-2024
Documents
-
10-Sep-2024
Documents
-
05-Sep-2024
Documents
-
31-Aug-2024
Documents
-
23-Jul-2024
Documents
Sub judge-I
-
10-Jul-2024
Documents
Sub judge-I
-
11-Jun-2024
Documents
Sub judge-I
-
03-Jun-2024
Documents
Sub judge-I
-
29-May-2024
Documents
Sub judge-I
-
21-May-2024
Documents
Sub judge-I
-
14-May-2024
Documents
Sub judge-I
-
07-May-2024
Documents
Sub judge-I
-
29-Apr-2024
Documents
Sub judge-I
-
19-Mar-2024
Documents
Sub judge-I
-
11-Mar-2024
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
07-Mar-2024
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
29-Feb-2024
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
22-Feb-2024
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
12-Feb-2024
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
29-Jan-2024
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
18-Jan-2024
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
04-Jan-2024
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
19-Dec-2023
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
11-Dec-2023
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
22-Nov-2023
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
02-Nov-2023
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
19-Oct-2023
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
27-Sep-2023
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
20-Sep-2023
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
31-Aug-2023
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
09-Aug-2023
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
18-Jul-2023
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
10-Jul-2023
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
28-Jun-2023
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
20-Jun-2023
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
07-Jun-2023
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
30-May-2023
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
15-May-2023
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
22-Mar-2023
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
28-Feb-2023
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
15-Feb-2023
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
07-Feb-2023
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
09-Jan-2023
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
29-Nov-2022
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
19-Oct-2022
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
19-Sep-2022
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
30-Aug-2022
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
27-Jun-2022
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
07-Jun-2022
Hearing
-
05-May-2022
Hearing
-
31-Mar-2022
Hearing
-
08-Mar-2022
Hearing
-
22-Feb-2022
Hearing
-
07-Jan-2022
Hearing
-
15-Dec-2021
Hearing
-
02-Nov-2021
Hearing
-
01-Oct-2021
Hearing
-
23-Aug-2021
Hearing
-
30-Jul-2021
Hearing
-
22-Apr-2021
Hearing
-
08-Mar-2021
Hearing
-
04-Feb-2021
Hearing
-
23-Dec-2020
Hearing
-
01-Dec-2020
Hearing
-
20-Oct-2020
Hearing
-
25-Sep-2020
Hearing
-
21-Aug-2020
Hearing
-
10-Jul-2020
Hearing
-
05-Jun-2020
Hearing
-
24-Apr-2020
Hearing
-
27-Mar-2020
Hearing
-
12-Mar-2020
Hearing
-
20-Feb-2020
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
24-Jan-2020
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
17-Dec-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
26-Nov-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
18-Oct-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
22-Sep-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
11-Sep-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
02-Sep-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
02-Aug-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
31-Jul-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
26-Jul-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
24-Jul-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
25-Jun-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
27-May-2019
Hearing
-
29-Apr-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
15-Apr-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
05-Mar-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
19-Feb-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
16-Feb-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
14-Feb-2019
Hearing
Sub judge-I
-
24-Jan-2019
Hearing
-
03-Jan-2019
Evidence
-
19-Dec-2018
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
14-Dec-2018
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
11-Dec-2018
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
07-Dec-2018
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
01-Dec-2018
Evidence
Sub judge-I
-
29-Oct-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Nov-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 64/2015
Summary: The court allowed the intervention petition filed by Imamuddun and three others, permitting them to be made parties to the suit. The court found their presence essential for effective adjudication of the land title dispute, as they claim to be legal heirs of the original khatiyani raiyat and their claims directly affect the suit's outcome. The petition was granted with costs of Rs. 600/-. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts