KAMAL KISHORE YADAV AND OTHERS vs State of Bihar — 915/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 80,238,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRBJ010041132026
Filing Number
3341/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
915/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
525
Police Station
UDWANT NAGAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMAL KISHORE YADAV AND OTHERS
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR SINGH
-
2.KAMAL DHARI YADAV
-
3.KAMAL NARAYAN SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Bail Petition No. 915/2026 The court ALLOWED the bail petition of three petitioners—Kamal Kishor Yadav, Kamal Dhari Yadav, and Kamal Narayan Singh—accused in a dowry death case. The court found insufficient evidence linking them to disposing of the deceased's body, noting they were not residents of the occurrence village and one petitioner had documented mental illness since 2005. They were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to standard conditions against witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 915/2026
Case Summary: Bail Petition No. 915/2026 The court ALLOWED the bail petition of three petitioners—Kamal Kishor Yadav, Kamal Dhari Yadav, and Kamal Narayan Singh—accused in a dowry death case. The court found insufficient evidence linking them to disposing of the deceased's body, noting they were not residents of the occurrence village and one petitioner had documented mental illness since 2005. They were released on bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties, subject to standard conditions against witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts