PRABHAT YADAV vs State of Bihar — 881/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),3(5). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.
Regular Bail
CNR: BRBJ010039882026
Filing Number
3227/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
881/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Bhojpur DJ Division
Judge
1-Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Last updated 23-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
495
Police Station
UDWANT NAGAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRABHAT YADAV
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR PANDEY
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Bihar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur dismissed the bail petition of Prabhat Yadav in a murder case (Udwantnagar PS Case No. 495/2025) where an 85-year-old senior citizen was shot dead. The court found the petitioner's confession in the case diary, 21 phone conversations with a co-accused on the day of occurrence (corroborated by CDR reports), and five prior criminal antecedents rendered bail unsuitable despite the lack of eyewitnesses. The court determined the bail petition was devoid of merit given the grave nature of the offense and incriminating evidence against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
Awaiting for Case Diary
Principal Dist. and Ses. Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 881/2026
Court Decision Summary The District & Sessions Judge, Bhojpur dismissed the bail petition of Prabhat Yadav in a murder case (Udwantnagar PS Case No. 495/2025) where an 85-year-old senior citizen was shot dead. The court found the petitioner's confession in the case diary, 21 phone conversations with a co-accused on the day of occurrence (corroborated by CDR reports), and five prior criminal antecedents rendered bail unsuitable despite the lack of eyewitnesses. The court determined the bail petition was devoid of merit given the grave nature of the offense and incriminating evidence against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts